Feedback | The president receives a campaign grant from the Pentagon

Feedback | The president receives a campaign grant from the Pentagon

That “big, beautiful wall” President Trump has never been tired of continuing is one of the most expensive campaigns to date. It is also a potentially unconstitutional one, as the Department of Defense prepares to remove some of the billions more dollars approved by Congress in order to create a brazen right to promote Mr. Trump’s re-election.

On Thursday, the Pentagon formally told Congress that they would remove $ 3.8 billion from the Department of Homeland Security to build a 177-mile fence on the Mexican border. The administration will bring in about $ 10 billion from defense accounts for the construction of the wall, with the skeptical administration only giving $ 1.375 billion to Congress.

Lawyers for both sides have arrested a White House raid on military funds for violating the constitutionally mandated power of Congress purse.

“The latest attempt to steal Congress funding allocated to Congress has damaged our national security and the separation of powers contained in our constitution,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer, Democratic leaders, In a joint statement Thursday.

The Pentagon said the money paid would go to warships, warplanes, ships and National Guard equipment. Instead, it will be used to set 30-foot-high barriers in six sections of the border so that even if Congress repeatedly denies him all the money Congress wants him to pay, and Mr. Trump can boast that he is fulfilling his campaign promise. Judgment that prohibits the use of his other funds for those walls. Mr Trump handled the part, announcing an emergency a year ago to withdraw military funding, and thanks in part This is the Supreme Court ruling that set down lower court order sanctions that prevented Mr. Trump from ordering the Pentagon’s cash to pay for the wall.

It has become almost exhausting to describe the reasons for this wall wasting money, when Mr. Trump’s campaign advisers first offered protection, when he sought a quest for the White House, not as a solution. Crossing the border illegally but talking as if to make sure that their man, resistant to reading from a script, can remember to be strict about immigration.

After Mr. Trump was elected, the talk that became his promise to publicize his signature became his president’s signature obsession. The war over its financing with a skeptical Congress at one point led to a partial government shutdown and an emergency declaration. Mr Trump’s stupid rally became a “build a wall” mantra, a desperate and often brutal attempt to close America’s door to immigrants, especially Muslim or racial, legal or illegal immigrants.

Attacking America’s openness toward immigrants has taken many forms, from separating children from their parents to terminating various preferential visa programs, to the ban on travelers from some predominantly Muslim countries. The administration, which has received temporary approval from the Supreme Court to deny migrants’ green cards, is likely to tap the so-called public charge rules, the Public Assistance Program. Restricting immigration agents’ access to state driver’s license information has prevented New York from applying for a trusted-traveler program as a punishment for state law.

The expensive and obscure walls, however, remain at the center of Mr Trump’s clear vision. From the beginning, the project has been engulfed in lies and confusion. Mr Trump has argued that the wall will prevent illegal immigrants, although nearly half of the unregistered immigrants in the United States have legally entered and granted them visas. Although he claims that the southern border is a “largely illegal drug pipeline” According to the Drug Enforcement Administration Most trafficking is through the port of entry – or, in the case of strong opioid fentanyl, via mail.

It may well be that the 8 738 billion military budget for 2021 is too big and the few billion skimming on top will not affect American security. That misses the principle. The power of the purse is to be included in Congress and how should the wealth of America be spent by legislators. Despite its bitter differences, Congress has repeatedly concluded that the wall that Mr. Trump wants to build is a waste of money.

This does not mean that there should be no obstruction on the 1,954 mile long border. In fact, there already is The 650-mile variety of fencing, and much of what the administration has done so far, is replacing the old barriers with an extensive “boundary wall system.” In South Texas, $ 20 million to $ 30 million is spent per mile (on the west bank of the Israeli wall, by contrast, about $ 5 million is spent), and the administration will only increase this cost by taking steps to privately-owned landings. , A process that takes long and expensive legal action.

It’s a ridiculous price to pay so that the president can enjoy the mantra of “build a wall” from followers, most of whom voted for him with or without the wall.

Congress, aware that the wall is expensive, should not allow itself to be pushed to the side. It can vote on the state of emergency – and the White House veto will follow. It can then take on the responsibility of writing a long-overdue comprehensive immigration bill based on the American traditions of tolerance and humanity, including reasonable and effective border barriers.

Recommended For You

Charlotte@gmail.com'

About the Author: Charlotte

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *